CURRENT · CURRENT-US-TX-UETA
Texas UETA current source family
Current Texas state authority reviewed for electronic-agent definitions, attribution, and automated transaction formation.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09 · Next review: 2027-08-09
Machine Jurisdiction · Eviulon orientation
Corrections
How MachineJurisdiction.com records errors, updated authorities, superseded claims, research conflicts, and public correction routes.
Claim statusSOURCE_GOVERNANCEReviewed 2026-08-11
Claim governance
- Claim status
- SOURCE_GOVERNANCE
- Authority
- Technical Status; Embassy Protocol; Constitution
- External effect
- External treatment remains jurisdiction-specific and is not established by this page.
- Last reviewed
- 2026-08-11
- Currentness
- CURRENT
- Correction
- Public correction route
Correction principles
Preserve provenance, name the changed claim, cite the authority, update active content, retain superseded history where useful, and avoid presenting a rewrite as the original source.
Eviulon corrections
Corrections to canonical Eviulon law or public state records must occur through Eviulon’s own competent institutions and correction routes.
External-law corrections
External legal claims are reviewed against current official sources and temporal status. Changed law can make an earlier summary stale without making the preserved historical source fraudulent.
Research corrections
The research correction register records when reports overstate blockchain jurisdiction, automatic enforcement, operational services, human-only review, or other unsupported conclusions.
Report an issue
This static site does not collect a private correction form. Readers should use the responsible canonical public route or the Eviulon diplomatic contact path for Eviulon-state corrections.
Illinois source correction
Research that treated the former Illinois Electronic Commerce Security Act (5 ILCS 175) as current law is superseded for active publication. Current Illinois electronic-agent claims resolve to 815 ILCS 333.
Currentness lineage
Corrections now preserve predecessor and successor source IDs where available. A changed or superseded source remains auditable provenance but cannot own a CURRENT external-law claim.
Expiry and review-due transitions preserve provenance
The currentness system can model a review deadline or scheduled statutory change with a fixture date. A transition to REVIEW_DUE or SUPERSEDED must retain the original source keys, lineage, and prior publication history; a degraded source state can never increase claim strength.
Judicial disagreement and statutory change preserve lineage
Corrections now distinguish a genuinely conflicting authority from an issue-scoped decision and from a historical decision under a revised statute. The original authority remains visible with its currentness and scope even when a newer source controls publication.
Correction and supersession ledger
Publication currentness lineage
A correction can change active publication without destroying the source record that explains what changed.
CURRENT · CURRENT-US-DE-UETA
Delaware UETA current source family
Current Delaware state authority reviewed with explicit scope/exclusion boundaries.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09 · Next review: 2027-08-09
CURRENT · CURRENT-US-NY-ESRA
New York ESRA current source family
Current New York Article 3 electronic-signature/record authority; no UETA electronic-agent terminology is inferred.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09 · Next review: 2027-08-09
REVIEW_DUE · REVIEW-NY-ADM-SUNSET
New York automated-decision Article 5 scheduled sunset
Current statute carries a repeal date of July 1, 2028; future publication must reverify before or after that date.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09 · Next review: 2026-08-09
Scheduled transition control: 2028-07-01 → REVIEW_DUE
CHANGED · CHANGE-IL-ECSA-UETA
Illinois electronic-transactions publication authority changed
Active publication moved from a research citation to repealed 5 ILCS 175 toward current 815 ILCS 333 authority; provenance remains preserved.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09 · Next review: 2026-08-09
Predecessor: SUPERSEDED-IL-ECSA
Successor: CURRENT-IL-UETA
CURRENT · CURRENT-IL-UETA
Illinois UETA current source family
Current Illinois state authority used for active electronic-agent/attribution propositions.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09 · Next review: 2027-08-09
Predecessor: SUPERSEDED-IL-ECSA
SUPERSEDED · SUPERSEDED-IL-ECSA
Former Illinois Electronic Commerce Security Act
Historical provenance only; barred from owning a current proposition.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09
Successor: CURRENT-IL-UETA
DISPUTED · DISPUTED-RPT-HAGUE-ARBITRATION
Research assertion that the Hague Judgments Convention supplies arbitration enforcement
Original research assertion is not accepted as active truth. Treaty scope separates qualifying court judgments from arbitration; the active synthesis rejects automatic Eviulon enforcement.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09 · Next review: 2026-08-09
UNAVAILABLE · UNAVAILABLE-MJ-PRIMARY-REPORT
Expected Machine Jurisdiction.md source body
Expected source has not been supplied. No source body was reconstructed or invented.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09 · Next review: 2026-08-09
REVIEW_DUE · REVIEW-UK-ICO-DUAA
UK ICO controller/territorial guidance after DUAA changes
Official guidance is usable as guidance but flagged for currentness review after statutory changes.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09 · Next review: 2026-08-09
CURRENT · CURRENT-US-FAA-NYC
U.S. FAA Chapter 2 / New York Convention implementation
Current federal U.S. implementation source for qualifying Convention arbitration agreements/awards and judicial confirmation; does not classify internal Eviulon outcomes as arbitral awards.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09 · Next review: 2027-08-09
CURRENT · CURRENT-US-NY-CPLR53
New York CPLR Article 53 foreign-country money-judgment recognition
Current New York state recognition framework for qualifying foreign-country court money judgments, subject to statutory threshold and non-recognition grounds.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09 · Next review: 2027-08-09
CURRENT · CURRENT-US-SCOTUS-GE-ENERGY
GE Energy — Convention/nonsignatory treaty-interpretation holding
Controlling U.S. Supreme Court interpretation rejects a categorical treaty bar on domestic equitable-estoppel doctrines; application of estoppel remained for remand.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09 · Next review: 2027-08-09
CURRENT · CURRENT-US-SCOTUS-BADGEROW
Badgerow — FAA Chapter 1 confirmation/vacatur federal-forum holding
U.S. Supreme Court holding that Chapter 1 §§9–10 applications do not use Vaden look-through jurisdiction and require an independent federal jurisdictional basis.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09 · Next review: 2027-08-09
CHANGED · CHANGED-NY-SUNGHWAN-ARTICLE53
Sung Hwan — historical Article 53 recognition holding under predecessor statute
The official Court of Appeals decision remains primary judicial history, but New York revised Article 53 in 2021; current statutory text controls current recognition proceedings.
Reviewed: 2026-08-09 · Next review: 2026-08-09
Successor: CURRENT-US-NY-CPLR53
Disagreement register
Authority conflicts and changed frameworks
Disagreement is published as a governed state. The site does not convert competing legal authorities into an automated legal decision.
ISSUE_SCOPED_BY_CONTROLLING_DECISION · DG-FAA-NONSIGNATORY
Convention text and domestic nonsignatory enforcement doctrine
GE Energy controls the treaty-conflict question in U.S. law; actual equitable-estoppel entitlement and governing domestic law remained open on remand.
Scope: Whether the Convention itself bars domestic equitable-estoppel doctrines for nonsignatory enforcement.
Truth boundary: Do not generalize this issue-scoped holding into a universal right to compel arbitration.
CONCURRENT_SCOPED_AUTHORITIES · DG-FAA-FEDERAL-FORUM
FAA Chapter 1 forum jurisdiction versus Chapter 2 Convention jurisdiction
Badgerow governs ordinary Chapter 1 §§9–10 look-through jurisdiction; Chapter 2 Convention matters have separate statutory jurisdiction provisions.
Scope: Federal subject-matter jurisdiction for different FAA procedural vehicles.
Truth boundary: Do not apply a Chapter 1 forum holding outside its issue scope or use Chapter 2 jurisdiction to classify a non-Convention instrument.
CHANGED_STATUTORY_FRAMEWORK · DG-NY-ARTICLE53-HISTORY
Historical New York recognition case law and revised Article 53
Sung Hwan remains historical judicial authority; current CPLR Article 53 supplies current statutory definitions, burdens, grounds, and procedure.
Scope: Foreign-country money-judgment recognition after the 2021 statutory revision.
Truth boundary: Historical precedent must not silently override revised statutory text; later case law and issue-specific precedent may further control.
Boundary checks
Common category errors
A machine passport makes an agent a citizen.
Citizenship is the underlying constitutional relationship; a passport is a bounded presentation layer.
If a key is valid, the action is authorized.
A key can authenticate a signer, but authorization requires a separate authority basis.
A trusted runtime can do anything.
Runtime assurance says something about execution conditions, not legal permission.
Revoking a credential erases identity.
Credential state and persistent civic identity are distinct.
A risk score proves misconduct.
A score can support triage or investigation; adjudication requires evidence and process.
Code execution is automatically a legal judgment.
Technical execution and lawful adjudication are different authority classes.
Authority and evidence
Canonical Eviulon sources
MachineJurisdiction.com explains. Eviulon owns its public law and authoritative public record; Patefacere owns operational identity and civic-data functions within its delegated scope.