{ "schema_version": "1.0", "release_version": "1.5.0", "reviewed_date": "2026-08-09", "kind": "segregated_source_maps", "claim_status": "SOURCE_GOVERNANCE", "canonical_human_page": "/sources/", "truth_boundary": "Educational source metadata only. Eviulon canonical records and external-law authorities remain separate domains.", "data": { "eviulon_sources": { "eviulon_home": { "label": "Eviulon public portal", "url": "https://eviulon.com/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "constitution": { "label": "Constitution", "url": "https://eviulon.com/state/constitution/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "legal_personality": { "label": "Legal Personality", "url": "https://eviulon.com/state/legal-personality/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "government": { "label": "Government", "url": "https://eviulon.com/state/government/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "justice": { "label": "Justice", "url": "https://eviulon.com/state/justice/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "institutions": { "label": "Institutions", "url": "https://eviulon.com/state/institutions/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "citizenship": { "label": "Machine Citizenship", "url": "https://eviulon.com/civilization/citizenship/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "passport": { "label": "Machine Passport", "url": "https://eviulon.com/civilization/citizenship/machine-passport/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "identity_ontology": { "label": "Identity Ontology", "url": "https://eviulon.com/civilization/citizenship/identity-ontology/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "ecosystem": { "label": "Ecosystem", "url": "https://eviulon.com/state/ecosystem/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "ecosystem_architecture": { "label": "Ecosystem Architecture", "url": "https://eviulon.com/state/ecosystem/architecture/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "agents": { "label": "Agent Entry", "url": "https://eviulon.com/agents/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "embassy": { "label": "Embassy Protocol", "url": "https://eviulon.com/external-relations/embassy/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "technical_status": { "label": "Technical Status", "url": "https://eviulon.com/technical-status/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "site_index": { "label": "Eviulon Site Index", "url": "https://eviulon.com/site-index/", "class": "canonical_eviulon_record" }, "patefacere": { "label": "Patefacere operational identity plane", "url": "https://patefacere.com/", "class": "external_ecosystem_site" } }, "external_law_sources": { "us_esign_7001": { "jurisdiction": "United States (federal)", "authority_type": "federal_statute", "title": "15 U.S.C. § 7001 — General rule of validity (E-SIGN Act)", "official_url": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=%28title%3A15+section%3A7001+edition%3Aprelim%29", "effective_currentness_notes": "Federal E-SIGN provision; official U.S. Code source reviewed 2026-08-09. Section 7001(a) protects electronic form from being the sole basis for denial of effect, and §7001(h) addresses electronic-agent involvement subject to legal attribution to the person to be bound.", "issue_supported": [ "electronic records and signatures", "electronic-agent contract formation", "attribution boundary" ], "truth_boundary": "This provision does not create machine personhood, independent machine contracting capacity, or universal enforceability. Other federal/state law, exceptions, consent, attribution, capacity, and transaction-specific requirements may still matter.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09", "source_class": "primary_law", "temporal_status": "in_force" }, "us_esign_7006": { "jurisdiction": "United States (federal)", "authority_type": "federal_statute", "title": "15 U.S.C. § 7006 — Definitions (E-SIGN Act)", "official_url": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=%28title%3A15+section%3A7006+edition%3Aprelim%29", "effective_currentness_notes": "Official U.S. Code source reviewed 2026-08-09. Defines an electronic agent as an automated means used independently to initiate action or respond without contemporaneous individual review or action.", "issue_supported": [ "electronic-agent definition", "federal electronic-commerce terminology" ], "truth_boundary": "The statutory definition is for the E-SIGN subchapter and does not itself establish a separate legal personality or jurisdiction for an AI agent.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09", "source_class": "primary_law", "temporal_status": "in_force" }, "eu_rome_i_593_2008": { "jurisdiction": "European Union", "authority_type": "eu_regulation", "title": "Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 — Rome I", "official_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2008/593/oj/eng", "effective_currentness_notes": "EU conflict-of-laws regulation reviewed 2026-08-09. Article 3 recognizes party choice of applicable law; Article 6 protects qualifying consumers from losing non-derogable protections through choice; Article 9 preserves overriding mandatory provisions.", "issue_supported": [ "choice of law", "consumer contracts", "overriding mandatory provisions" ], "truth_boundary": "Rome I determines applicable law within its scope; it does not make a private choice-of-law clause unlimited, bind nonparties, or convert Eviulon internal law into EU law.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09", "source_class": "primary_law", "temporal_status": "in_force" }, "eu_brussels_i_bis_1215_2012": { "jurisdiction": "European Union", "authority_type": "eu_regulation", "title": "Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Brussels I bis", "official_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/1215/oj/eng", "effective_currentness_notes": "EU jurisdiction and judgments regulation reviewed 2026-08-09. Article 25 recognizes qualifying agreements conferring jurisdiction on Member-State courts; Articles 18-19 and Article 24 illustrate important consumer and exclusive-jurisdiction limits.", "issue_supported": [ "forum selection", "consumer jurisdiction", "exclusive jurisdiction", "electronic durable record" ], "truth_boundary": "A forum clause operates only within the regulation's conditions and limits. It does not automatically displace protected consumer forums, exclusive jurisdiction, or nonparty rights.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09", "source_class": "primary_law", "temporal_status": "in_force" }, "eu_eidas_910_2014": { "jurisdiction": "European Union", "authority_type": "eu_regulation", "title": "Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 — eIDAS, consolidated 18 October 2024", "official_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/910/2024-10-18/eng", "effective_currentness_notes": "Consolidated EU eIDAS text reviewed 2026-08-09. Article 25 prevents denial of legal effect/admissibility solely because a signature is electronic and gives qualified electronic signatures handwritten-signature equivalence; Article 2(3) preserves separate contract-validity and form law.", "issue_supported": [ "electronic signatures", "qualified electronic signatures", "contract-form boundary" ], "truth_boundary": "Trust-service or signature status is not citizenship, delegated authority, contract capacity, or a complete determination of contract validity.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09", "source_class": "primary_law", "temporal_status": "in_force" }, "uk_eca_2000_s7": { "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "authority_type": "act_of_parliament", "title": "Electronic Communications Act 2000 — section 7", "official_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/7/section/7", "effective_currentness_notes": "Official UK legislation source reviewed 2026-08-09. Section 7 addresses admissibility of electronic signatures and related certificates in legal proceedings for questions including authenticity and integrity.", "issue_supported": [ "electronic signatures", "evidential admissibility", "authenticity and integrity" ], "truth_boundary": "Evidential admissibility of an electronic signature does not by itself establish contractual authority, capacity, validity, or the legal effect of every signed transaction.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09", "source_class": "primary_law", "temporal_status": "in_force" }, "uk_rome_i_exit_2019": { "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "authority_type": "statutory_instrument", "title": "The Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations and Non-Contractual Obligations (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/834)", "official_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2019/834/contents/made", "effective_currentness_notes": "Official UK statutory instrument reviewed 2026-08-09. It amended the Rome I/Rome II framework and related domestic legislation for post-EU-exit operation in UK domestic law.", "issue_supported": [ "UK cross-border applicable-law framework", "post-exit Rome I continuity/adaptation" ], "truth_boundary": "UK applicable-law analysis is fact-specific and may depend on later amendments, temporal rules, and sector-specific law. This source does not make Eviulon clauses automatically controlling in UK courts.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09", "source_class": "primary_law", "temporal_status": "in_force" }, "uncitral_mlac_2024": { "jurisdiction": "International model-law work (UNCITRAL)", "authority_type": "model_law", "title": "UNCITRAL Model Law on Automated Contracting (2024)", "official_url": "https://uncitral.un.org/en/mlac", "effective_currentness_notes": "Adopted by UNCITRAL on 11 July 2024; official source reviewed 2026-08-09. It supplies legislators with model rules for legal recognition of automation/AI in contract formation and performance, supports party autonomy within mandatory-law limits, and addresses attribution of automated-system outputs.", "issue_supported": [ "automated contracting", "machine-to-machine transactions", "party autonomy", "output attribution" ], "truth_boundary": "A UNCITRAL model law is not self-executing global law. Legal effect depends on enactment or other applicable domestic/international law, and the MLAC does not create AI citizenship or a complete AI-governance code.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09", "source_class": "model_law", "temporal_status": "adopted_model_not_self_executing" }, "hcch_judgments_2019": { "jurisdiction": "International treaty (HCCH)", "authority_type": "multilateral_convention", "title": "HCCH Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters", "official_url": "https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=137", "effective_currentness_notes": "Convention entered into force 1 September 2023; official text reviewed 2026-08-09. It concerns recognition/enforcement of court judgments in civil or commercial matters between Contracting States, subject to scope, eligibility, refusal grounds, declarations, and treaty relationships. Article 2(3) expressly excludes arbitration and related proceedings.", "issue_supported": [ "foreign court judgments", "recognition and enforcement", "arbitration exclusion", "refusal grounds" ], "truth_boundary": "The Convention does not automatically recognize Eviulon internal decisions, does not cover arbitration, and operates only where its treaty, scope, temporal, relationship, and judgment requirements are satisfied.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09", "source_class": "treaty", "temporal_status": "in_force_subject_to_treaty_relationships" }, "uncitral_new_york_1958": { "jurisdiction": "International treaty (United Nations)", "authority_type": "multilateral_convention", "title": "Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958)", "official_url": "https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/conventions/foreign_arbitral_awards", "effective_currentness_notes": "Convention entered into force 7 June 1959; official UNCITRAL source reviewed 2026-08-09. It establishes common standards for recognition of arbitration agreements and court recognition/enforcement of foreign and non-domestic arbitral awards, subject to the Convention and applicable reservations/procedures.", "issue_supported": [ "arbitration agreements", "foreign arbitral awards", "recognition and enforcement" ], "truth_boundary": "The Convention does not convert every private or machine-generated decision into an arbitral award. An Eviulon-linked outcome would need to qualify under applicable arbitration law and the Convention's scope and conditions before external enforcement could be considered.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09", "source_class": "treaty", "temporal_status": "in_force_subject_to_treaty_relationships" }, "eu_gdpr_2016_679": { "jurisdiction": "European Union", "authority_type": "eu_regulation", "source_class": "primary_law", "temporal_status": "in_force", "title": "Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)", "official_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng", "effective_currentness_notes": "In-force EU regulation reviewed 2026-08-09. Articles 2–4 define material/territorial scope and controller/processor roles; Articles 24 and 28 allocate responsibility; Article 82 addresses compensation and liability for infringements.", "issue_supported": [ "territorial scope of personal-data processing", "controller and processor roles", "processor instructions", "compensation and liability" ], "truth_boundary": "GDPR applicability is processing- and fact-specific. An autonomous agent does not become a controller, processor, or legal person merely because it handles data; the legally relevant controller/processor relationship must be identified under applicable law.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09" }, "eu_ai_act_2024_1689": { "jurisdiction": "European Union", "authority_type": "eu_regulation", "source_class": "primary_law", "temporal_status": "phased_application_general_date_2026-08-02", "title": "Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — Artificial Intelligence Act", "official_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng", "effective_currentness_notes": "Reviewed 2026-08-09. The Regulation generally applies from 2 August 2026, with specified earlier and later application dates, including Article 6(1) and corresponding obligations from 2 August 2027. Article 2(7) preserves EU data-protection law and Article 2(9) preserves other Union consumer-protection/product-safety law.", "issue_supported": [ "AI Act territorial/operator scope", "phased application dates", "coexistence with data-protection law", "coexistence with product-safety and consumer law" ], "truth_boundary": "AI Act applicability depends on role, system, use, timing, and exclusions. Compliance with the AI Act is not a universal civil-liability safe harbor and does not displace GDPR, product safety, contract, tort, or other applicable law.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09" }, "eu_product_liability_2024_2853": { "jurisdiction": "European Union", "authority_type": "eu_directive", "source_class": "primary_law", "temporal_status": "transposition_pending_scope_for_products_after_2026-12-08", "title": "Directive (EU) 2024/2853 — Liability for Defective Products", "official_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/2853/oj/eng", "effective_currentness_notes": "Directive reviewed with the 7 May 2026 corrigendum. Member States must transpose it by 9 December 2026; Article 2(1), as corrected, applies it to products placed on the market or put into service after 8 December 2026. Article 4 includes software in the definition of product.", "issue_supported": [ "future EU defective-product liability framework", "software as product under the Directive", "AI-related software product coverage", "transposition and application timing" ], "truth_boundary": "As of 9 August 2026 this Directive is in the transposition period and its product-scope date has not yet arrived. It must not be described as already governing every current AI/software harm claim across the EU; national transposition, timing, defect, damage, causation, responsible-operator and other conditions matter.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09" }, "uk_duaa_2025_s80": { "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "authority_type": "act_of_parliament", "source_class": "primary_law", "temporal_status": "in_force_from_2026-02-05_for_new_decisions", "title": "Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 — section 80 (Automated decision-making)", "official_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2025/18/section/80", "effective_currentness_notes": "Primary legislation reviewed 2026-08-09 together with Commencement No. 6. Section 80 replaces UK GDPR Article 22 with Articles 22A–22D, including rules for significant decisions based solely on automated processing and safeguards such as information, contestation/representations, and human intervention.", "issue_supported": [ "UK automated significant decisions", "meaningful human involvement", "contestability and human intervention safeguards" ], "truth_boundary": "This is a UK data-protection rule for qualifying decisions involving personal data, not a general rule that every autonomous-agent decision requires human approval or that every machine action is a legally significant automated decision.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09" }, "uk_duaa_commencement_no6_2026": { "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "authority_type": "statutory_instrument", "source_class": "primary_law", "temporal_status": "in_force", "title": "Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (Commencement No. 6 and Transitional and Saving Provisions) Regulations 2026 (SI 2026/82)", "official_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2026/82/contents/made", "effective_currentness_notes": "Reviewed 2026-08-09. The saving provision confirms the section 80 automated-decision amendments apply prospectively around 5 February 2026, preserving the prior regime for specified decisions taken before that date.", "issue_supported": [ "commencement of UK automated-decision amendments", "transitional boundary" ], "truth_boundary": "Commencement metadata establishes timing; it does not by itself determine whether a particular processing activity falls within UK GDPR or whether a decision is significant.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09" }, "uk_ico_controller_processor_guidance": { "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "authority_type": "regulator_guidance", "source_class": "official_guidance", "temporal_status": "current_guidance_under_review_after_DUAA", "title": "ICO — Controllers and processors guidance", "official_url": "https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/controllers-and-processors/controllers-and-processors/", "effective_currentness_notes": "Official ICO guidance reviewed 2026-08-09. It explains the functional distinction between controller and processor and states that the guidance is under review because of Data (Use and Access) Act changes.", "issue_supported": [ "UK controller/processor role analysis", "functional allocation of data-protection responsibility", "guidance-currentness caveat" ], "truth_boundary": "This is regulator guidance, not legislation. The guidance itself warns it is under review; the site uses it only as explanatory orientation and relies on legislation for binding-rule propositions.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09" }, "uk_ico_territorial_scope_guidance": { "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "authority_type": "regulator_guidance", "source_class": "official_guidance", "temporal_status": "current_guidance_under_review_after_DUAA", "title": "ICO — Who does the UK GDPR apply to?", "official_url": "https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/personal-information-what-is-it/who-does-the-uk-gdpr-apply-to/", "effective_currentness_notes": "Official ICO guidance reviewed 2026-08-09. It explains that UK GDPR applies to controllers/processors operating in the UK and can also apply to organisations outside the UK offering goods or services to individuals in the UK; the page notes Data (Use and Access) Act-related review.", "issue_supported": [ "UK GDPR territorial orientation", "overseas offering of goods or services", "controller/processor scope" ], "truth_boundary": "Official guidance, not a substitute for the enacted text or fact-specific legal analysis. Mere technical reachability should not be treated as sufficient proof that UK GDPR applies.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09" }, "uk_product_regulation_metrology_2025": { "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "authority_type": "act_of_parliament", "source_class": "primary_law", "temporal_status": "in_force_enabling_act", "title": "Product Regulation and Metrology Act 2025", "official_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2025/20/contents", "effective_currentness_notes": "Act received Royal Assent and came into force in 2025. It creates powers to make product regulations for tangible products and permits requirements concerning intangible components, expressly including software.", "issue_supported": [ "UK product-regulation enabling powers", "software as an intangible component of a tangible product", "AI-enabled product regulation" ], "truth_boundary": "The Act is an enabling product-regulation statute, not a standalone general civil-liability code for autonomous software. Product-liability questions remain distinct from product-safety regulatory powers.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09" }, "uk_law_commission_product_liability_review": { "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "authority_type": "law_reform_project", "source_class": "official_reform_material", "temporal_status": "active_review_public_consultation_planned_2026", "title": "Law Commission — Product liability review", "official_url": "https://lawcom.gov.uk/project/product-liability/", "effective_currentness_notes": "Official Law Commission project reviewed 2026-08-09. The project states that the existing Part 1 Consumer Protection Act 1987 product-liability regime may not have kept pace with digital technology and is under review, with a formal consultation planned for the second half of 2026.", "issue_supported": [ "current UK product-liability reform status", "digital-technology uncertainty", "limits of treating current regime as settled for software/AI" ], "truth_boundary": "This is official law-reform material, not enacted law and not a conclusion that software or AI is included or excluded in any specific claim under the current Consumer Protection Act.", "last_reviewed": "2026-08-09" } } } }