{
  "schema_version": "1.0",
  "release_version": "1.25.0",
  "reviewed_date": "2026-08-11",
  "kind": "claim_status_vocabulary",
  "claim_status": "SOURCE_GOVERNANCE",
  "canonical_human_page": "/claim-status/",
  "truth_boundary": "Educational public data only. Not Eviulon law, a live registry, identity/status service, legal-decision API, or individualized legal advice.",
  "data": [
    {
      "id": "CANONICAL_EVIULON_RECORD",
      "label": "Canonical Eviulon record",
      "meaning": "A current public record whose authority is owned by Eviulon.",
      "supports": "Internal Eviulon public-law or state meaning within the scope of that record.",
      "does_not_prove": "External recognition or authority beyond the record."
    },
    {
      "id": "EVIULON_INTERNAL_POSITION",
      "label": "Eviulon internal position",
      "meaning": "A current Eviulon interpretation or framework whose external reception may vary.",
      "supports": "How Eviulon currently treats the issue internally.",
      "does_not_prove": "Binding effect on an external jurisdiction."
    },
    {
      "id": "EXTERNAL_PRIMARY_LAW",
      "label": "External primary law",
      "meaning": "A statute, regulation, treaty, or other primary external authority.",
      "supports": "The proposition actually stated by that instrument within its jurisdiction and temporal scope.",
      "does_not_prove": "Universal application to every machine or transaction."
    },
    {
      "id": "OFFICIAL_TECHNICAL_STANDARD",
      "label": "Official technical standard",
      "meaning": "A standards-body specification or official technical publication.",
      "supports": "Technical interoperability or implementation guidance.",
      "does_not_prove": "Citizenship, legal standing, or jurisdiction."
    },
    {
      "id": "COMPARATIVE_ANALOGY",
      "label": "Comparative analogy",
      "meaning": "A comparison to another institutional or legal model.",
      "supports": "Reasoning about design mechanics and tradeoffs.",
      "does_not_prove": "That Eviulon adopted the compared system."
    },
    {
      "id": "EDUCATIONAL_SCENARIO",
      "label": "Educational scenario",
      "meaning": "A fictional fact pattern for teaching.",
      "supports": "Understanding how the framework can be applied.",
      "does_not_prove": "A real case, precedent, adjudication, or live service."
    },
    {
      "id": "PROPOSED_MODEL",
      "label": "Proposed model",
      "meaning": "A design or policy proposal not established as current operation.",
      "supports": "Future-oriented architecture discussion.",
      "does_not_prove": "Deployment, adoption, or legal effect."
    },
    {
      "id": "CURRENTLY_UNAVAILABLE",
      "label": "Currently unavailable",
      "meaning": "Evidence or an operational state that has not been verified or is not public.",
      "supports": "An honest boundary around unknown facts.",
      "does_not_prove": "Success, failure, absence, or presence of a hidden system."
    },
    {
      "id": "DISPUTED",
      "label": "Disputed",
      "meaning": "A claim with material conflicting evidence or unresolved authority.",
      "supports": "The need for reasoned review and explicit competing evidence.",
      "does_not_prove": "Either side merely because it is asserted more confidently."
    },
    {
      "id": "SUPERSEDED",
      "label": "Superseded",
      "meaning": "A formerly active record replaced by a newer authoritative state.",
      "supports": "Historical provenance and comparison.",
      "does_not_prove": "Current authority."
    },
    {
      "id": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
      "label": "Not established",
      "meaning": "The available evidence does not support the asserted proposition.",
      "supports": "A controlled refusal to promote an unsupported claim.",
      "does_not_prove": "The logical opposite in every circumstance."
    }
  ]
}